讲述德国重要的哲学流派——法兰克福学派的思想内容和历史。由3sat推出。

“The cinematic spectacle has its rules, which enable one to produce satisfactory products. But dissatisfaction is the reality that must be taken as a point of departure. Whether dramatic or documentary, the cinema functions to present a false, isolated coherence as a substitute for communication and an activity that are absent. To demystify documentary cinema it is necessary to dissolve what is called its subject matter.” In this fascinating, seminal anti-film, Guy Debord articulates in full flesh his situationist manifesto, superimposing subtitles and a documentary-style commentary on a catalog of newsreel footage, book covers, rephotographed photographs, views of Paris’ neighborhoods, and seemingly candid footage of him and his friends in wandering between cafes and the street. Whereas the conventions of narrative fictional film would oblige us to separate the filmmaker Debord from both the voice of the film’s commentary and from the “character” played by Debord, a man in his late twenties pursuing a young girl who appears to be no more than seventeen. (源自: TIDF 2024)

BACKGROUND 　　Xu Tong is a documentary director. His work “Wheat Harvest”, was opposed by a small group of people for violating the privacy of sexual workers and copyright, ironically, these complaints help to let more people to know and watch this film. 　　WuHaoHao failed to film Xu Tong and used his materials about such incident as he couldn't get the copyright. Throughout the process of production, he criticized himself, the society, documentary format by deconstructing video, sound and text he got when he interview Xu Tong. Like using paper cutting, or his individual voice over to repeat the interview. 　　CONCEPT 　　The way the director criticizing documentary format by deconstructing the video, sound and text of his interview with Xu Tong inspired me to deconstruct all the Chinese characters for all the titles on the poster. 　　背景 　　徐童，紀錄片導演，他的作品《麥收》因涉及侵權與偷拍性工作者而引起小範圍反對，但諷刺地，這卻讓更多的人關注此片。 　　吳昊昊因未能得到徐童的允許，在製作該視頻作品中，所以他只能利用剪紙，或用個人旁白來重複訪問內容等方式製作。他解構視頻、聲音、文字的同時，發現原來也在批判自己、社會、和記錄片。 　　概念 　　海報的設計概念來自導演透過對紀錄片的視頻，聲音，文字，不斷解構而進行批判的這個行為，故海報中全部標題的漢字都被分拆，解構。

马德仁的短片遭到了批评，试图向他人表达他的观点，事情却朝不同的方向发展。

马德仁的短片遭到了批评，试图向他人表达他的观点，事情却朝不同的方向发展。

吴昊昊采访自己电影学院各个系的同学，对自己的电影学院进行批判。 　　Haohao Wu interviewed some of the classmates in the film academy and criticized the film academy.

在旅行社工作的合田圭子（南野阳子 饰）某天突然发现自己是艾滋病毒的携带者，经调查发现其学生时代的恋人早年在国外因事故输血感染艾滋病毒，并通过性爱传染给她。得知此事的记者津岛美幸（南果步 饰）赶来采访圭子，希望通过她的遭遇改变世人对艾滋病患者的偏见。 　　圭子结交男友高野（赤井英和 饰），但始终不敢将真相说出口，自杀未遂的圭子向高野坦白一切，高野无法接受事实，离她而去。这时候津岛的执著和真诚让身心受伤的圭子感到欣慰。某日圭子发现自己怀有身孕，孩子是否也是艾滋病毒的携带者？将为人母的圭子生命又将何时完结？ 　　改编自家田庄子同名获奖小说作品。

在旅行社工作的合田圭子（南野阳子 饰）某天突然发现自己是艾滋病毒的携带者，经调查发现其学生时代的恋人早年在国外因事故输血感染艾滋病毒，并通过性爱传染给她。得知此事的记者津岛美幸（南果步 饰）赶来采访圭子，希望通过她的遭遇改变世人对艾滋病患者的偏见。 　　圭子结交男友高野（赤井英和 饰），但始终不敢将真相说出口，自杀未遂的圭子向高野坦白一切，高野无法接受事实，离她而去。这时候津岛的执著和真诚让身心受伤的圭子感到欣慰。某日圭子发现自己怀有身孕，孩子是否也是艾滋病毒的携带者？将为人母的圭子生命又将何时完结？ 　　改编自家田庄子同名获奖小说作品。

Ahmet, Murat ve Sadi film çekme hayalleri kuran, ve parayı toplamak için 'Meslek Hikayeleri' adlı belgesel-programda sunuculuk yapan üç aktördür. amaçları bu programdan para topladıktan sonra gişe rekorları kıracak bir film çekebileceklerdir fakat çektikleri porgram yayınlanmayınca daha iyi bir bölüm çekmek için kolları sıvarlar. 　　Ahmet, başrol oynadığı günlerin özlemini çekmekte, mazideki başarılarının göz ardı edilmesinden şikayet etmektedir. Kendisinin artık tanınmadığını düşünmekte ve bu yüzden herkese sitem etmektedir. 　　Murat, mesleğinin gereklerini yapmaya çalışırken , kendisini terketmiş olan eski sevgilisiyle beraber çalışmanın zorluklarını yaşamaktadır. 　　Sadi, gümrük memurluğunu oyuncu olmak için bırakmış, para dertleri ve ailevi sorunlarla uğraşmaktadır. Figüranlık yaptığı dizisinden başka gelir kaynağı olmayan Sadi için 'Meslek Hikayeleri'nin yayınlanması ve ücretlerini almaları çok önemlidir. Bu sıra da programın Yapımcısı ve yapım ekibi işleri kolaylaştırmamakta güçleştirmektedir.

The present, the whole present and nothing but the present. A young man on a footbridge, a bus departs, his friend is gone. This is followed by a majestic parade through a shopping centre. This central shot in the film is a fragile balancing act between documentary observation and subtle direction. 　　Deliberately asynchronous sound serves to heighten the sense that events are nothing more than a construction of an apparently familiar reality. The boy's melancholic bearing, and the way the film unfolds, are embedded in an extremely expressive, albeit narratively minimalistic, dramaturgy of colour. Vibrant colours introduce each individual sequence: blue, green, yellow, orange, red.